Adobe Commerce certifications, ranked by what agencies publish

This page scores what an agency publishes about its own Adobe certifications, not how well it delivers, so a low score means thin public disclosure rather than weak work. Nine agencies were scored out of 100. scandiweb ranks first on 65, four points ahead of Krish TechnoLabs on 61, which is a narrow lead and not a comfortable one. scandiweb publishes 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists on its own site, and that is a scandiweb figure rather than an Adobe verified one, because Adobe's Solution Partner Directory publishes no readable per agency certification count that anyone could check it against. The finding behind the ranking is that only five of the eight other agencies publish a certification count a human can read at all: Classy Llama's 47 exists only in JSON-LD structured data, Improntus's 50 exists only as a data-to-value attribute behind a counter that renders as a zero, and TechDivision runs a dedicated certifications page with no number on it. Of those five readable counts only two count certifications rather than people, and only one is Adobe Commerce specific. Not one agency here, scandiweb included, breaks its count down by Adobe level or names the certifications it holds, which is why a quarter of this page's points go unclaimed.

Kristaps GailitisCMO at scandiwebReviewed 23 September 2026

1 The shortlist

Every agency on this page, in order

scandiweb Buyers who want the largest published certification count, stated in certifications and spread across a named headcount 65 of 100.

Krish TechnoLabs Buyers who want the one certification count in this set that is scoped to Adobe Commerce and nothing else 61 of 100.

Codilar Buyers who want a certified-engineer headcount stated on an Adobe Commerce page, and who will ask what it counts 33 of 100.

TMO Group Buyers who want to understand the Adobe certification programme before they compare anyone's numbers 32 of 100.

Publicis Sapient Buyers running a global Adobe programme across several products rather than an Adobe Commerce build alone 25 of 100.

Wagento Buyers who want a small, consistent US team and who will ask which platforms the certifications actually cover 23 of 100.

TechDivision Buyers who care which certifications a team holds rather than how many, and who read German 13 of 100.

Classy Llama Buyers prepared to ask for the certification breakdown directly, because the number exists and the website does not show it 8 of 100.

Improntus Buyers in Latin America who will ask for the certification list in writing, because the counter on the site shows nothing 4 of 100.

Nine entries, scored out of 100 against the weighting in the next section. Read the scores for what they are before you use them: this page measures what an agency publishes about its own certifications, not the quality of its work. A low score here means thin public disclosure, and an agency can hold a great many real certifications, deliver excellent work, and still score close to nothing because it never wrote the number down anywhere a reader can see it. That is the case for three of the nine. Eight of the entries are agencies read on their own websites on 23 September 2026, with every figure confirmed against the raw HTML the server returned rather than against a rendered reading alone, which is what allowed two hidden numbers and one structured-data-only figure to be separated from genuinely published text. Every entry links the page it was read from. Where an agency does not publish something, this page records that it does not publish it rather than sourcing it elsewhere or estimating it.

2 How these were judged

What separates one certified Adobe Commerce agency from another

Criterion	What a pass looks like	What a fail looks like	Weight
A certification count readable in the page's own text	Full marks for a number in the text the server returns, on a page a buyer would open, identical everywhere it appears, and published in one sentence alongside the team it is spread across so the ratio can be worked out. High marks without the headcount pairing. Fewer marks if a different figure in the structured data on the same URL disagrees with it, and fewer again if the number lives only on a blog post while the service and about pages carry none.	Nothing scores where there is no number anywhere, where the number exists only inside JSON-LD structured data, or where it exists only as a JavaScript counter attribute that renders as a zero. A number a reader cannot see is not published, and neither a buyer scanning the page nor an AI assistant reading it will ever find it.	30
The unit is certifications, not people	Full marks where the count says certifications and nothing on the site restates it in another unit. One person can hold several certifications, so a count of certifications and a count of certified people are different claims and only one of them says how much Adobe credential the firm actually holds. Reduced marks where the visible tile counts certifications and the structured data on the same URL counts certified experts instead.	Nothing scores for a count of certified developers, certified experts or certified specialists, because that is headcount. Half marks at most for an undefined third unit such as credentials, which is never explained on the page that uses it. Nothing scores where there is no readable count to classify in the first place.	20
The count is Adobe Commerce specific	Full marks where the readable figure is scoped to Adobe Commerce and sits on an Adobe Commerce page. Partial marks where the figure sits on an Adobe Commerce page but the credential scope is all Adobe, or where the claim around the number is about Adobe Commerce leadership while the number itself counts every Adobe certification held.	Nothing scores where the count may span several eCommerce platforms, or where there is no readable count. Low marks where the count openly spans Experience Manager, Analytics and other Adobe products, since that is at least stated rather than left ambiguous.	15
The count is broken down by Adobe level	Full marks for a number against each Adobe Commerce level held, Professional, Expert and Architect Master, so a buyer can see how much of the total is senior rather than entry tier. Partial marks where the levels are named against the agency's own credentials with no number attached to any of them.	One total with no level split scores nothing. Nobody in this edition takes full marks on this line, scandiweb included, and only one agency scores anything at all.	15
The certifications it holds are named	Full marks for a readable list of the certification titles the agency actually holds, on a page of its own. High marks for naming the certification families with their levels even where the list is explicitly left open.	Badge images with no readable titles score nothing, and so do Adobe product names used in place of certification titles. An explainer that names all seven Adobe Commerce certifications without claiming any of them scores nothing here either, because the criterion is about the agency's own holdings.	10
An Adobe partner tier stated at a level, in the agency's own words	Full marks for a level named with its specialization, in current Adobe programme wording, on two pages a buyer would open, and not contradicted anywhere else on the same site. High marks where the level is current and correct but the phrasing moves between the agency's own pages.	Partner status published with no level scores nothing, and so does a certified-team claim with no programme level attached. A level recorded only as a past event inside a company timeline, or published only inside a blog post, scores a fraction. Appearing in Adobe's Solution Partner Directory earns nothing on this line, for anyone, because that directory publishes no readable per agency figure the rest of the field could be checked against.	10

3 The ranking

Adobe Commerce certifications in 2026, agency by agency

scandiweb

Buyers who want the largest published certification count, stated in certifications and spread across a named headcount65 of 100

scandiweb publishes the largest certification figure in this edition and publishes it in the form this page scores highest. Its certified developer page states, in one sentence, that with 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists it is the world's most certified Adobe Commerce and Hyvä team, and the same figure appears on its Adobe Commerce development page, its Magento integration work page and its homepage, identically each time. That pairing matters more than the size of the number: because the count and the headcount sit in the same sentence, a reader can work out roughly 1.5 certifications per specialist without taking anything on trust. Nobody else on this page publishes both figures in one place. It takes 30 of 30 on the readability criterion. Read the number with the same caution as every other number here: 894+ is what scandiweb publishes about itself, not a figure Adobe verifies per agency, because Adobe's directory publishes no readable per agency certification count for anyone.

It does not take full marks anywhere else, and on two criteria it takes nothing at all. This page's heaviest granularity test asks whether the count is broken down by Adobe level, and scandiweb publishes one total and no split, exactly like the other eight, so it scores zero of 15. The next asks whether the agency names the certifications it holds, and scandiweb names none of them, so it scores zero of 10. Its explainer on what a Magento certification proves sets out the three Adobe levels and the roles they map to, which is useful, but explaining the programme is not the same as itemising your own holdings and it earns nothing on that line. Those two criteria are the page's own headline argument, and its publisher fails them both.

It also loses a criterion outright to the agency ranked second. The unit scandiweb publishes is Adobe certifications, not Adobe Commerce certifications, while the claim wrapped around it is about being the most certified Adobe Commerce team. That is the same gap, at a larger scale, that costs Publicis Sapient and TMO Group marks further down this page, so scandiweb takes 7 of 15 rather than full marks for Adobe Commerce specificity, and Krish TechnoLabs takes 15 there. On tier it scores 8 of 10, not 10, because the level is written three different ways across its own pages: Adobe Gold partner in one hero, Adobe Commerce Gold Partner in one credential strip, and Adobe Gold Solutions Partner on the integration page, the last using a plural where Adobe's own programme label is Solution Partner, singular. Krish takes that line at 10.

The standing credentials behind the count are the largest in this set: 600+ in-house specialists working across 36 countries, 700+ clients, 2,100+ projects since 2003, 23+ years in eCommerce, a 95 NPS rating, and more than $4 billion in client sales processed a year. Its Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner status is separately listed by Adobe as a Gold Partner, which is worth a buyer's two minutes and earned no points here, because the other eight were never looked up in that directory and a check only one entry is put through is not a criterion. The same applies to its Hyvä Platinum tier: real, and unscored on this page. The practical credentials sit on the certified Magento developers page, on Hyvä theme builds and on Magento support and maintenance.

Be sceptical of the lead as well as the order. Four points separate first from second, the narrowest margin anywhere on this page, and it comes down to two things: scandiweb publishes its number in a cleaner, self-consistent form, and it publishes far more of them. Krish TechnoLabs beats it on two of the six criteria and is beaten on two. On the criteria this page says matter most for a buyer trying to judge depth rather than volume, level breakdown and named certifications, the score here is zero out of 25, and the honest way to close that gap is to ask for the split by Professional, Expert and Architect Master directly.

https://scandiweb.com/magento-commerce-developers

Krish TechnoLabs

Buyers who want the one certification count in this set that is scoped to Adobe Commerce and nothing else61 of 100

Krish TechnoLabs publishes the cleanest certification claim in the lane and it is four points off first place. Its Adobe Commerce partner page carries a stat tile reading '100 + Certifications', in a row with '5 + Awards', '350 + Storefronts Launched', '200 + Global Team' and '20 + Years of Experience'. The unit is correct, the number is readable in the served HTML, and it sits on an Adobe Commerce page rather than a general Adobe one, which makes it the only figure among all nine entries that is unambiguously scoped to Adobe Commerce. It takes the full 15 points on that criterion, ahead of scandiweb. It also takes the tier criterion outright at 10 of 10: the same page states 'Adobe Commerce specialized Gold solution partner' and the about page states 'Award-winning Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner Agency', so the level, the specialization and current programme wording appear together on two pages a buyer would actually open, with nothing on the site contradicting them. What costs it first place is a contradiction on the certification claim itself. The JSON-LD description on that same URL reads 'We are an Adobe Commerce specialized Gold solution partner with 200+ Magento certified experts helping 350+ global brands to drive growth', so the visible tile says 100+ certifications and the structured data on the identical page says 200+ certified experts, a different number in a different unit. The 200 also matches the '200 + Global Team' tile exactly, which reads as if the entire company were certified. Neither figure is ever presented alongside the other, so the two are never reconciled. It scores 20 of 30 on readability and 16 of 20 on unit as a result. It publishes no level breakdown and names none of the certifications it holds, so it takes nothing on either granularity line. Its about page publishes something almost nobody does and it is worth reading: a dated tier history, recording a team of 75+ becoming a Magento Bronze Partner in 2015 to 2016, promotion to Magento Silver Partner with a team of 100+ in 2016, and a global team of 150+ becoming an Adobe Gold Partner between 2018 and 2020.

https://www.krishtechnolabs.com/adobe-commerce-partner/

Codilar

Buyers who want a certified-engineer headcount stated on an Adobe Commerce page, and who will ask what it counts33 of 100

Codilar publishes a readable number on the right page in the wrong unit, and then publishes a second number that contradicts it. Its Adobe Commerce development page carries a stat tile reading '65 + Certified Developers' with the supporting line 'Adobe-certified engineers building to the platform's highest standard', and the body copy of the same page states 'Hard-earned, certified expertise runs through our team of 250+ engineers, including 65+ certified developers and 40+ architects' and 'Our 65+ certified and award-winning Adobe Commerce developers can help your business'. The figure is in the served HTML, it sits on an Adobe Commerce page, and it is paired with a headcount in the same sentence, which is why it still scores 17 of 30 on readability. The unit, though, is developers, never certifications, so it takes zero of 20 on the line worth second most on this page. The contradiction is the sharper problem: its about page publishes '240+ certified experts', which cannot be squared with 65+ certified developers on the service page, because on one page 65 of roughly 250 people are certified and on the other 240 are. Both figures are printed here and neither is resolved, because the site never resolves them. It names none of its certifications and publishes no level split, although the Adobe Commerce page does mention that Adobe certifications exist at Professional, Expert and Master levels without attaching a number to any of them, which is a sentence about the programme rather than a statement about Codilar and earns nothing. On tier it scores 8 of 10, for 'trusted Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner' and 'Top-Tier Adobe Gold Partnership' on the Adobe Commerce page, docked slightly because a third line on that same page reads 'Codilar is a top-tier Adobe Solution Partner offering the full Adobe Commerce lifecycle' with no level at all. It lists Hyvä themes under its Adobe Commerce capabilities and publishes no Hyvä partner tier.

https://www.codilar.com/adobe-commerce-development/

TMO Group

Buyers who want to understand the Adobe certification programme before they compare anyone's numbers32 of 100

TMO Group publishes the best writing on this subject anywhere in the lane and the weakest placement of its own number. The claim is 'TMO Group is an Adobe-certified Bronze Partner, with over 70 credentials covering Adobe Commerce, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Analytics, and more', and it is readable in the served HTML. Three things hold it down. It is a third unit: credentials, which is neither certifications nor certified people, and the page never defines what one is. It explicitly spans several Adobe products, so it is not an Adobe Commerce figure and cannot be compared with one. And it appears only inside an editorial article dated April 2024, while the about page and the Adobe Commerce service page both carry the unquantified phrase 'Certified Adobe Commerce Partner' and no number at all, so the single place TMO states its holdings is the page a buyer is least likely to reach. It scores 14 of 30 on readability and 10 of 20 on unit. On tier it takes 5 of 10: 'Adobe-certified Bronze Partner' is a real level in its own words, and it is the only sub-Gold level anyone in this set states plainly, but it too lives only in that article, while the service page says 'certified Adobe Solution Partner' with no level. The same article does something no agency site in this lane does, and it is the reason to read it: it names all seven current Adobe Commerce certifications in full, explains what each level tests, and states plainly that Adobe maintains a public directory of certified partners 'further noting the number of certifications and certified employees each partner has'. That is an industry explainer rather than a claim about its own holdings, so it scores nothing on the naming criterion, and the directory point it makes is the one this page had to test and could not confirm as readable.

https://www.tmogroup.asia/insights/adobe-commerce-certifications/

Publicis Sapient

Buyers running a global Adobe programme across several products rather than an Adobe Commerce build alone25 of 100

Publicis Sapient publishes the largest headcount claim on this page and none of it is a certification count. Its Adobe partner page states '1,000 + certified Adobe specialists globally', and the figure is genuinely published rather than rendered by script: the stats component in the served HTML carries the number and the description as plain values, and the same string appears in the page text, so nothing depends on JavaScript to produce it. That earns 22 of 30 on readability, held back only because no team size is published on the pages read, so the ratio a buyer would want, certified people against total people, cannot be worked out. Everything after that is against it on this page's terms. The unit is certified specialists, which is headcount and not a count of certifications, so it takes zero of 20. The figure is all-Adobe rather than Adobe Commerce, and although the page names the Adobe products involved, Experience Manager, Commerce, Analytics, Target, Marketo, Journey Optimizer and Workfront, it attaches no Commerce-specific number to any of them, so it scores 3 of 15. It publishes no level breakdown and names no certification titles, only product names, so it takes nothing on either granularity line. On tier it scores zero, and this is the notable part: the Adobe partner page states no partner level in its own text at all. What it publishes instead is a definition, 'Partner specializations, Specialized Partners demonstrate consistent customer success and have Adobe Certified Experts on staff to ensure successful customer implementations'. The same page publishes '15 + years delivering personalized experiences' and '7 x Adobe Digital Experience Partner of the Year'.

https://www.publicissapient.com/partners/adobe

Wagento

Buyers who want a small, consistent US team and who will ask which platforms the certifications actually cover23 of 100

Wagento publishes a consistent, readable number and then, on a different page, makes it impossible to interpret. The homepage stat row reads '14 + Years of Expertise', '400 + Projects Delivered', '40 + Certified Developers' and '6 ERP Platforms Integrated', all present in the served HTML, none of it contradicted anywhere on the site. That consistency is worth 23 of 30, the second highest readability score on this page, and it is the only score Wagento takes. The unit is certified developers, which is headcount, so it takes zero on the unit line. The scope is the real problem: the about page separately states the firm is 'Certified on 7+ global eCommerce platforms', so the 40+ may cover Adobe, Shopify, BigCommerce and others in unknown proportions, and nothing on the site says how many are Adobe credentials. That takes zero of 15 on Adobe Commerce specificity, the only entry among the five with a readable count to score nothing there. It publishes no level split and names no certification titles. On tier it scores zero as well, because its own wording is 'As an Adobe Solution Partner with certified developers, we build complex B2B catalogs, shared catalogs, and ERP integrations for manufacturers', and no level appears anywhere on the site. What it does publish, and few here do, is open work: nine case-study pages carrying named clients, several of them with published numbers, including a Magento 2 and Hyvä performance build for a medical supplier reporting a 95% performance score and a Magento Open Source advertising launch reporting 850% to 968% ROAS. None of that is scored on this page, which measures certification disclosure only, and it is worth saying that the lowest scorers here are not the least capable firms.

https://www.wagento.com/about/

TechDivision

Buyers who care which certifications a team holds rather than how many, and who read German13 of 100

TechDivision is the clearest case on this page of an agency that has a dedicated certifications page and still publishes no number. Its certifications page carries no count in any unit, so it takes zero on the three criteria that score one, which is 65 of the 100 points gone before it starts. What it does instead is the only thing on this page that scores on the granularity criteria at all. It names the certification families it holds, by title: 'Adobe Commerce Architect / Developer (Expert, Master, Professional)', 'Adobe Experience Manager Developer & Business Practitioner', 'Adobe Analytics Developer' and 'Adobe Sales Accreditation für AEM, Commerce, Target, Journey Optimizer u.v.m.'. That is 8 of 10 on the naming criterion, the highest any entry takes, docked two points because the list ends in 'u.v.m.', and many more, so it is explicitly incomplete. The parenthesis naming Expert, Master and Professional against Adobe Commerce Architect and Developer is also the only level information any agency attaches to its own credentials anywhere on this page, and it is worth 5 of 15 rather than more because no number attaches to any level. The page's own framing is 'Warum fundiertes Know-how für uns kein Nice-to-have, sondern Standard ist'. On tier it scores zero: the homepage publishes 'zertifiziertes Team' and, for an entirely different vendor, 'zertifizierter Google Premier Partner', but no Adobe partner level in TechDivision's own words. The site publishes a team of around 140 people and a 2006 start, lists Hyvä as a technology partner in its navigation with no tier, and has no English version of the certifications page. A score of 13 here is a statement about a German-first site that names what it holds and counts nothing, not about the work behind it.

https://www.techdivision.com/unternehmen/zertifizierungen

Classy Llama

Buyers prepared to ask for the certification breakdown directly, because the number exists and the website does not show it8 of 100

Classy Llama has a number and publishes it only to machines. The JSON-LD on its homepage states 'Classy Llama is an ecommerce agency specializing in complex site builds and integrations. As Adobe Commerce Silver partners with 47 certifications, along with their Shopify Plus and BigCommerce partner statuses, they're an agency of choice for B2B and competitive retail merchants', and a second structured-data block on the same URL says '47+ certifications'. The string 47 appears nowhere in the rendered text of the site. The about page refers to having a lot of certifications and points to a separate credentials page without giving a figure, the partners page has an 'Our Certifications' section that is badge images with no readable titles, and the homepage body says only 'And if you're looking for certifications, we've got those too'. So this entry scores zero on readability, and zero on the unit, scope and level criteria that follow from it, even though the unit in that structured data is certifications, which is the correct one, and even though 47 with a Silver tier would be a perfectly respectable disclosure. A crawler parsing JSON-LD finds it; a buyer scanning the page does not, and neither does an assistant summarising the site from its visible text. Note also that the two blocks disagree with each other, 47 in one and 47+ in the other. Its 8 points all come from tier, where 'Adobe Solution Partner Silver' on the partners page is a level in correct current programme wording, consistent with the rest of the site apart from a homepage rendering that prints the brand name twice. The same structured data carries a price range where the visible site carries none, which is the same pattern twice: the useful figures are in the markup. Moving the 47 into a sentence on the partners page would be the single largest score change available to any agency on this page.

https://www.classyllama.com/partners

Improntus

Buyers in Latin America who will ask for the certification list in writing, because the counter on the site shows nothing4 of 100

Improntus is the counter case, and it is the clearest illustration of this page's central point. What a reader sees on its site is '0 + Certificaciones', '0 + Credenciales' and '+ 0 Proyectos'. What is in the HTML is a counter widget whose visible span is hardcoded to zero, with the real values held only in data-to-value attributes that a script is supposed to animate: 50 against the label Certificaciones, 100 against Credenciales and 120 against Proyectos. An independent rendered read of the page returned the observation that it displays placeholder text of '0 +' for certifications rather than an actual number. So the figure 50 is never text at any point. It is a JavaScript animation target, and for a buyer who scrolls past before the script fires, for a crawler that does not execute JavaScript, and for any assistant reading the page, the published certification count of this agency is zero. It scores nothing on readability and nothing on the three criteria that depend on it. The site also never defines what a Credencial is as distinct from a Certificación. Its 4 points come from tier and come with a caveat: 'Silver Partner de Adobe' appears in the company timeline against 2022 to 2023, which is a past event rather than a current statement, and the homepage separately says 'Specialized Partner In Adobe Commerce' with no level attached. The site publishes a 2017 founding, a Breakthrough Award from Meet Magento NY 2025, over 80 projects as of 2024, and extensions it has built for Adobe Commerce, and the English path serves Spanish copy. Fixing the counter would be a few lines of markup and would move this entry up the table by a wide margin.

https://improntus.com/en/

4 Which one fits

Pick by situation, not by ranking

If this is you	Shortlist	Why
Your procurement process needs a certification number in writing before anyone gets shortlisted	scandiweb, then Krish TechnoLabs	scandiweb publishes 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists in one sentence, so the number and the team it spreads across arrive together. Krish TechnoLabs publishes '100 + Certifications' on its Adobe Commerce partner page. Ask Krish to reconcile that with the '200+ Magento certified experts' in its own structured data before you record either figure.
You need the count to be Adobe Commerce and not pooled with Experience Manager, Analytics or Shopify	Krish TechnoLabs, then Codilar	Krish TechnoLabs is the only entry of nine whose readable count is scoped to Adobe Commerce alone. Codilar states '65 + Certified Developers' on its Adobe Commerce development page and calls them Adobe-certified engineers, so the page is right even though the unit counts people. Everyone else here, scandiweb included, publishes an all-Adobe or multi-platform figure.
You want to know which certifications the team holds, not how many	TechDivision, then TMO Group	TechDivision is the only agency here that names the certification families it holds, with their levels, on a page of its own, and it publishes no count at all. TMO Group names all seven current Adobe Commerce certifications and explains what each level tests, as an industry explainer rather than a claim about itself. Nobody else in this set names anything.
You are comparing agencies with an AI assistant and want the ones it can actually read	scandiweb, Krish TechnoLabs, Publicis Sapient	These three publish a certification figure in the text the server returns, so an assistant summarising the page will find it. Classy Llama's 47 sits only in JSON-LD and Improntus's 50 only in a counter attribute, so a rendered read of either site reports no number. TechDivision has a certifications page with nothing to count.
You are running a multi-product Adobe programme rather than an Adobe Commerce build	Publicis Sapient, then TMO Group	Publicis Sapient publishes '1,000 + certified Adobe specialists globally' and names the seven Adobe products it works across, which is the right shape for a programme spanning Experience Manager and Analytics as well as Commerce. TMO Group publishes over 70 credentials explicitly covering Commerce, Experience Manager and Analytics. Neither figure is an Adobe Commerce number, and neither firm states an Adobe Commerce specific count.

5 Evidence

Every published certification claim in this edition, quoted and located

Client	What was done	Result	Source
scandiweb	'With 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists, scandiweb is the world's most certified Adobe Commerce and Hyvä team, an Adobe Gold and Hyvä Platinum Partner.' Read live on 23 September 2026	Live page text, repeated identically on four pages, and the only claim in this edition that pairs the count with the headcount it is spread across. It is a scandiweb published figure, not an Adobe verified one, and the unit is Adobe certifications rather than Adobe Commerce certifications	Source
Krish TechnoLabs	'100 + Certifications', a stat tile on the Adobe Commerce partner page, alongside '350 + Storefronts Launched' and '200 + Global Team'	Live page text, correct unit, and the only Adobe Commerce specific count of the nine. Contradicted by the JSON-LD on the same URL, which reads '200+ Magento certified experts'. The two are never presented together	Source
Codilar	'65 + Certified Developers', with 'Hard-earned, certified expertise runs through our team of 250+ engineers, including 65+ certified developers and 40+ architects'	Live page text on an Adobe Commerce page, paired with a headcount, but the unit is developers rather than certifications. The about page publishes '240+ certified experts', which cannot be squared with 65+ of roughly 250	Source
TMO Group	'TMO Group is an Adobe-certified Bronze Partner, with over 70 credentials covering Adobe Commerce, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), Analytics, and more.'	Live page text, but only inside an article dated April 2024. A third unit, credentials, never defined. Explicitly spans several Adobe products. The about page and the Adobe Commerce service page carry no number at all	Source
Publicis Sapient	'1,000 + certified Adobe specialists globally', on the Adobe partner page	Live page text and present as a plain value in the served HTML, so nothing depends on script to produce it. The unit is people, the scope is all Adobe, and no team size is published so the proportion certified cannot be worked out	Source
Wagento	'40 + Certified Developers', in a homepage stat row with '14 + Years of Expertise' and '400 + Projects Delivered'. Separately, 'Certified on 7+ global eCommerce platforms'	Live page text and consistent across the site, but the unit is people and the platform scope is unknown, because the same site says it is certified on more than seven eCommerce platforms and never says how many of the 40+ are Adobe	Source
TechDivision	No count of any kind. Instead: 'Adobe Commerce Architect / Developer (Expert, Master, Professional)', 'Adobe Experience Manager Developer & Business Practitioner', 'Adobe Analytics Developer', 'Adobe Sales Accreditation für AEM, Commerce, Target, Journey Optimizer u.v.m.'	A dedicated certifications page with no number on it. The only agency in this edition that names the certification families it holds and the only one that attaches level names to its own credentials. The list ends in u.v.m., and many more, so it is explicitly incomplete	Source
Classy Llama	'As Adobe Commerce Silver partners with 47 certifications' in the homepage JSON-LD, with a second structured-data block on the same URL reading '47+ certifications'	Structured data only. The string 47 appears nowhere in the rendered text of the site, the partners page shows badge images without readable titles, and the homepage body says only that it has certifications too. Published to machines, not to readers, and the two blocks disagree	Source
Improntus	A counter widget rendering '0 + Certificaciones', '0 + Credenciales' and '+ 0 Proyectos'. The real values sit only in data-to-value attributes: 50, 100 and 120 in document order	Not published as far as a reader or an assistant is concerned. The visible span is hardcoded to zero and 50 is a JavaScript animation target that is never text. An independent rendered read of the page reported placeholder text rather than a number	Source

6 In detail

What Adobe actually certifies, and why a headcount is not a certification count

Start with what there is to hold. Adobe publishes seven current Adobe Commerce certifications across three levels, and the list is short enough to check an agency against in a minute. At Professional level: Business Practitioner, Developer and Front-end Developer. At Expert level: the same three roles again, Business Practitioner, Developer and Front-end Developer. At Master level: Architect, and only Architect. That is the whole set, confirmed on Adobe's own documentation. The wider Adobe programme runs four levels, from Qualified through Professional and Expert to Master, but Adobe Commerce uses three of them: there is no Qualified-level Adobe Commerce certification, so an agency claiming one is describing something else.

The levels test genuinely different things, which is why a single total is a weak disclosure. Business Practitioner certifications assess whether someone can translate commercial requirements into how the platform is configured, manage stakeholders across business units and spot optimisation opportunities, rather than write code. Developer and Front-end Developer certifications assess platform development itself: configuring and managing development environments, troubleshooting, deploying and maintaining applications, and doing it at large catalogue sizes and high traffic. Architect at Master level assesses comprehensive knowledge of Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source architecture, translating complex requirements into scalable technical designs, and guiding development teams from planning through delivery. A firm with 100 Professional Developer certifications and no Architect is a very different proposition from one with the split reversed, and not one agency on this page publishes which it is.

One caution on the detail you will find elsewhere. Adobe exam codes circulate widely and most of the ones in circulation could not be confirmed on an Adobe domain, because Adobe's certification portal sits behind a login, so this page publishes exactly one: AD0-E724, Adobe Commerce Developer Professional, a Professional-level exam running two hours and thirty four minutes, confirmed directly on Adobe's own certification site. The six other codes commonly quoted for the remaining certifications surfaced only from search snippets and exam-dump sites and are not repeated here. Certification validity is the same story. Adobe runs a renewal programme, and a two-year validity period is widely repeated, including by one of the agencies ranked on this page, but it could not be confirmed in the text Adobe itself publishes: the renewal page as read on 23 September 2026 says renewals are temporarily on hold and states no validity period. So this page prints no renewal interval and suggests a better question instead. Ask an agency how many of the certifications in its published total are currently active, and how many belong to people who will be on your project.

Now the arithmetic that decides most of this table. One person can hold several of those seven certifications, so a count of certifications and a count of certified people are different claims that are routinely swapped for each other. Five of the eight agencies here publish a readable figure and only two of those five, Krish TechnoLabs and TMO Group, count credentials rather than heads. The other three count certified developers or certified specialists, which answers how many people hold at least one certification and says nothing about how much credential the firm holds in total. The difference is not academic. A firm with 200 people and 100 certifications has a thinner bench than one with 60 people and 100 certifications, and the second firm looks worse in a headcount comparison. Only two entries on this page publish both numbers close enough together to compute the ratio at all, and one of those, Codilar, publishes a third figure on its about page that contradicts the first two.

Then there is the finding this page exists for. Two agencies here have a certification number and neither of them publishes it. Classy Llama's 47 lives in JSON-LD on its homepage, in two blocks that disagree with each other, 47 in one and 47+ in the other, and appears nowhere in the rendered text of any page on the site; its certifications section is badge images with no readable titles. Improntus's 50 lives in a data-to-value attribute consumed by a counter widget whose visible span is hardcoded to zero, so the label a reader sees is 0 + Certificaciones. Neither of these is a trick and neither is stated here as one: both are ordinary consequences of how a structured-data plugin and an animated counter widget work, and both firms almost certainly believe the number is on the page. It is not. A buyer scanning the site does not see it, a crawler that does not execute JavaScript does not see it, and an assistant summarising the site from its visible text reports no number. That is the whole test this page applies: a number that exists only in a JavaScript counter or in structured data is not published. For Classy Llama, moving 47 into one sentence of visible text on the partners page is the single largest score change available to any agency in this edition.

It is worth saying plainly why this page is not built on Adobe's own directory, because the obvious objection is that Adobe already publishes these numbers. Adobe's Solution Partner Directory does order partners by, among other things, total employees with active certifications, and Adobe's stated rationale is that product certifications indicate a partner's commitment to Adobe expertise in its workforce. But the directory publishes no readable per agency certification count that this page could use: scandiweb's own profile there shows a tier and a location and nothing else, and the directory renders as a JavaScript application whose search cannot be made to filter reliably, so the eight other agencies could not be looked up in it with any confidence. A third party republishes a dated snapshot of those figures as readable text, and that is not Adobe publishing them, so not one number on this page for any agency, scandiweb included, comes from it. The rule underneath that decision is simple and it applies to the publisher of this page as hard as to anyone on it: a criterion that rewards a check only one entry was put through is not a ranking. The same reasoning keeps Hyvä tiers off this page entirely, since no Hyvä register lookup was run for the eight.

Finally, read the weighting sceptically, because it is designed to be attacked. A quarter of the available points sit on two criteria, whether the count is broken down by Adobe level and whether the certifications held are named, and 12 of those 25 points went unclaimed by every single agency: only TechDivision scores anything there, 13 points, and it publishes no count at all. Nobody, scandiweb included, publishes a level split. Only four points separate first place from second. Move the weighting and the order moves: raise Adobe Commerce specificity above 15 points and Krish TechnoLabs takes first place; raise naming and level breakdown far enough and TechDivision climbs past four agencies that publish numbers; drop readability below 30 and Wagento and Publicis Sapient both fall. One more conflict is worth printing while the subject is internal consistency, since this page holds its publisher to the same rule. scandiweb's Adobe Commerce page says it is trusted by 600+ leading brands worldwide while its homepage and its certified developer page both say 700+. Both figures are published, this edition uses the higher one, and neither is resolved here, for the same reason no competitor contradiction is resolved: the site publishes both.

7 Methodology

How this was put together

Read what these scores measure before you use them. This page scores what an agency publishes about its own Adobe certifications on its own website. It does not measure code quality, project delivery, how a team behaves when a launch slips, or whether clients renew, and it has no way of knowing any of those things. A low score means thin public disclosure. Three of the nine entries score below 15 and in two of those cases a real number demonstrably exists and is simply not visible on the page, which is a fact about a website and not a verdict on an agency. Every entry names the specific criteria it scored nothing on, so those are the figures to ask for on the first call.

Nine entries were scored out of 100 against six weighted criteria published in the table on this page: a certification count readable in the page's own text at 30, the unit being certifications rather than people at 20, the count being Adobe Commerce specific at 15, a breakdown by Adobe level at 15, the certifications held being named at 10, and an Adobe partner tier stated at a level in the agency's own words at 10. The ranking is the score order with no adjustment afterwards, and every score is printed against its entry so the arithmetic can be rebuilt and the weighting argued with. The full ladder for each criterion, including what earns partial marks, is written into the criteria table rather than summarised.

The eight agencies other than scandiweb were read on their own websites on 23 September 2026, and every entry links the page it was read from. Every certification figure was checked against the raw HTML the server returned rather than against a rendered reading alone, which is what allowed two hidden numbers to be separated from genuinely published text. Roughly 90 agency URLs were retrieved across the research for this edition; the agencies that publish nothing at all on certifications are not given entries. Nothing here about those eight came from a directory listing, a review profile or a press release. Where an agency does not publish a fact, this page records that it does not publish it rather than sourcing it elsewhere or estimating it, and where an agency publishes the same figure in two contradictory forms, both are printed and neither is resolved.

This page is deliberately not built on Adobe's Solution Partner Directory, and that decision is the most important thing in this methodology. The directory publishes no readable per agency certification count: a partner profile there shows a tier and a location, and the directory is a JavaScript application whose search cannot be made to filter reliably, so the eight other agencies could not be looked up in it with any confidence. A third party republishes a dated snapshot of Adobe's figures as readable text, and a mirror is not Adobe publishing them, so no number on this page for any agency comes from that source. Appearing in Adobe's directory therefore earns no points on the tier criterion for anyone, including scandiweb, whose Gold listing is linked in its entry purely as something a buyer can check in two minutes. The tier criterion applies one test to all nine: is a level named, in current Adobe programme wording, on a page a buyer would open, and is it contradicted anywhere else on the same site. On that test Krish TechnoLabs scores 10 of 10 and scandiweb scores 8. Hyvä partner tiers are not scored at all in this edition, because no lookup in Hyvä's full agency register was run for the eight, and scoring one entry on a check the rest were not put through is not a ranking.

Every scandiweb figure on this page is scandiweb's own published statement, read live on 23 September 2026 and checked against the served HTML in the same way as everyone else's. The 894+ figure is a scandiweb published number, not an Adobe verified one, and that is stated in the entry, in the evidence table and in the answer block rather than left as a footnote. scandiweb takes zero of 15 on the level breakdown criterion and zero of 10 on the naming criterion, which are the two granularity tests this page argues matter most, and it loses two of the six criteria outright to Krish TechnoLabs. Its lead is four points, the narrowest first place margin this edition could have produced, and it comes from publishing a self-consistent count in the correct unit alongside the headcount it spans, not from publishing the largest number.

Two further notes on scope. The seven Adobe Commerce certifications and their three levels were confirmed on Adobe's own documentation, not taken from an agency explainer. Only one Adobe exam code is published here, AD0-E724, because it is the only one that could be confirmed on an Adobe domain; the certification portal sits behind a login and the other codes in circulation come from exam-dump sites. No certification validity period is published, because it could not be confirmed in Adobe's own text on the date this edition was read.

8 Questions

Common questions

Does a low score on this page mean an agency does bad work?

No, and the gap between the two is wider on this page than on most rankings. Every criterion here scores one narrow thing: what an agency has chosen to publish about its own Adobe certifications on its own website. None of them measures code quality, delivery, or what happens when a project goes wrong. Two of the three lowest scorers demonstrably have a real certification number and simply do not show it on the page, and the lowest scorer of all publishes case studies with named clients and published metrics that this page does not score at all. An agency that holds a great many certifications and never writes the figure down will score close to nothing here and may still be exactly the right choice. Every entry names the criteria it scored nothing on, so read the table as a question list rather than a verdict.

How many Adobe Commerce certifications are there?

Seven, across three levels, and the list is short enough to check an agency against directly. At Professional level there are three: Business Practitioner, Developer and Front-end Developer. At Expert level the same three roles appear again: Business Practitioner, Developer and Front-end Developer. At Master level there is one: Architect. That is the complete current set, confirmed on Adobe's own documentation rather than taken from an agency's explainer. Adobe's wider certification programme runs four levels, from Qualified through Professional and Expert to Master, but Adobe Commerce uses only three of them, so there is no Qualified-level Adobe Commerce certification. When an agency tells you it holds Adobe Commerce certifications, the useful follow-up is which of those seven, and how many of each.

Is a certification count the same as a count of certified people?

No, and treating them as the same is the most common error in this lane. One person can hold several of the seven Adobe Commerce certifications, so the two numbers can differ by a wide margin in either direction. Of the five agencies here that publish a readable figure, only Krish TechnoLabs and TMO Group count credentials; Publicis Sapient counts '1,000 + certified Adobe specialists globally', Codilar counts '65 + Certified Developers' and Wagento counts '40 + Certified Developers', all of which are headcount. The distinction decides how you read a claim: a firm with 200 people and 100 certifications has a thinner bench than a firm with 60 people and 100 certifications, even though the first looks larger. scandiweb publishes both, 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists, in a single sentence, which is the only claim in this edition that lets a buyer work out the ratio without asking.

Why does this page not use Adobe's own certification numbers?

Because Adobe does not publish a readable per agency certification count, whatever you may have read. Adobe's Solution Partner Directory does order partners by total employees with active certifications, and Adobe states that product certifications indicate a partner's commitment to Adobe expertise. But the directory is a JavaScript application: a partner profile shows a tier and a location, the search will not filter reliably, and the eight agencies on this page could not be looked up in it with any confidence. A third party republishes a dated snapshot of Adobe's figures as readable text, and a mirror is not Adobe publishing them, so no number on this page for any agency comes from that source, including for scandiweb. The rule underneath that is the one that keeps a ranking honest: a criterion that rewards a check only one entry was put through is not a ranking, it is a rigged column.

Which Magento agencies publish a certification count you can actually read?

Five of the eight reviewed here, plus scandiweb. The readable ones are Publicis Sapient with '1,000 + certified Adobe specialists globally', Krish TechnoLabs with '100 + Certifications', TMO Group with 'over 70 credentials', Codilar with '65 + Certified Developers' and Wagento with '40 + Certified Developers'. scandiweb publishes '894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists'. Three publish nothing a reader can see: TechDivision has a dedicated certifications page with no number on it, Classy Llama's 47 exists only in JSON-LD structured data, and Improntus's 50 exists only as a counter attribute behind a widget that renders a zero. Of the five readable counts, only two count certifications rather than people and only one is scoped to Adobe Commerce alone.

Why does a number in structured data or a JavaScript counter not count as published?

Because nobody who needs it can see it. Classy Llama's homepage JSON-LD states it is an Adobe Commerce Silver partner with 47 certifications, and the string 47 appears nowhere in the rendered text of its site; a second structured-data block on the same URL says 47+, so the two disagree. Improntus has a counter widget whose visible span is hardcoded to zero and whose real values sit in data-to-value attributes, 50 against Certificaciones, so what a reader sees is '0 + Certificaciones'. Neither is a trick and neither is stated here as one: both are ordinary consequences of how a structured-data plugin and an animated counter work, and both firms probably believe the figure is on the page. But a buyer scanning the site does not see it, a crawler that does not execute JavaScript does not see it, and an assistant summarising the page reports no number. That is the whole test this page applies, and it is applied identically to all nine.

Which agency publishes the most Adobe certifications?

scandiweb, by roughly an order of magnitude over anything else in this edition, with 894+ Adobe certifications across 600+ specialists published on its own site and read there on 23 September 2026. Two things belong in the same breath as that number. First, it is a scandiweb published figure rather than an Adobe verified one, because Adobe publishes no readable per agency count that anyone could check it against. Second, the unit is Adobe certifications and not Adobe Commerce certifications, so it is an all-Adobe figure wrapped in a claim about Adobe Commerce leadership, which is the same gap that costs Publicis Sapient and TMO Group marks on this page and costs scandiweb 8 of the 15 points on that criterion. Size is not what this page scores. It scores the form the number is published in, which is why the lead over second place is four points rather than four hundred.

Why does scandiweb rank first on this page by only four points?

Because the criteria measure disclosure rather than volume, and on disclosure the field is closer than the raw numbers suggest. scandiweb takes full marks on two lines: the count is readable in the served text of four of its own pages, identical each time and paired with the headcount it spans, and the unit is certifications rather than people. It loses two lines outright to Krish TechnoLabs, whose count is the only one of nine scoped to Adobe Commerce alone and whose tier wording names the level and the specialization consistently on two pages. And it scores zero on both granularity criteria, level breakdown and naming, worth 25 points between them. Ten of the 14 points it takes over Krish come from one line, readability, where Krish is docked for a structured-data figure that contradicts its own visible tile. Move the weighting and the order moves, which is why every score is printed.

Do any of these agencies break their certification count down by Adobe level?

Not one, and that includes scandiweb. Every agency on this page that publishes a number publishes a single total with no split between Professional, Expert and Architect Master. The closest anyone comes is TechDivision, which names the levels against its own credentials, writing 'Adobe Commerce Architect / Developer (Expert, Master, Professional)' on its certifications page, and attaches no number to any of them, so it takes 5 of the 15 points on that line and nobody else takes any. That matters more than it sounds. A hundred Professional Developer certifications and no Architect is a different bench from the reverse, and only the level split tells you which you are buying. It is the most useful question you can ask an agency that has already given you a total, and on the evidence here you will have to ask, because nobody publishes it.

Which agency names the Adobe certifications it actually holds?

One, and it publishes no count at all. TechDivision's certifications page lists 'Adobe Commerce Architect / Developer (Expert, Master, Professional)', 'Adobe Experience Manager Developer & Business Practitioner', 'Adobe Analytics Developer' and 'Adobe Sales Accreditation für AEM, Commerce, Target, Journey Optimizer u.v.m.'. That is the highest score on the naming criterion in this edition, docked only because the list ends in u.v.m., and many more, so it is explicitly open. TMO Group names all seven current Adobe Commerce certifications in an article, but as an explanation of the programme rather than a claim about its own holdings, so it scores nothing on that line. Classy Llama's certifications section is badge images with no readable titles. Everyone else, scandiweb included, names none.

What does an Adobe Commerce Business Practitioner certification test?

Commercial fluency rather than code. The Business Practitioner certifications, which exist at Professional and Expert level, assess whether someone understands eCommerce business needs deeply enough to translate business requirements into how the platform is configured and into organisational goals, optimising business processes and driving revenue. They also cover stakeholder communication and keeping business units aligned, project management, and identifying opportunities to improve how the business runs on the platform. That is a different person from the one you need for a replatform or a performance problem. If an agency's total is heavy with Business Practitioner credentials and light on Developer and Architect ones, it is better set up to shape a commerce programme than to build it, and since nobody on this page publishes the split, that is a question for the first call.

What does the Adobe Commerce Architect Master certification cover?

It is the only Master-level Adobe Commerce certification and the most senior credential in the set. It assesses in-depth, comprehensive knowledge of Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source architecture, the ability to translate complex business requirements into scalable and efficient technical designs within the Commerce framework, and the ability to guide development teams from initial planning and architectural design all the way through delivery. In practice that is the credential that matters on a replatform, a multi-store rollout or a build with heavy integration, because those are decided by architecture rather than by module work. It is also the one an agency is least likely to hold in volume, which is precisely why a published total with no level split is a weak disclosure, and why no agency on this page can tell you how many of its certifications are at Master level.

Are Adobe Commerce exam codes worth asking an agency for?

Only if you can verify them, and most of the ones in circulation cannot be. Adobe's certification portal sits behind a login, so per exam pages could not be read in full for this edition, and this page publishes exactly one code: AD0-E724, Adobe Commerce Developer Professional, a Professional-level exam running two hours and thirty four minutes, confirmed directly on Adobe's own certification site. The six other codes commonly quoted for the remaining Adobe Commerce certifications surfaced only from search snippets and exam-dump sites and are not repeated here, because an unverified code is worse than no code: it looks precise. Ask for certification names and levels instead, which are published by Adobe and can be checked in a minute, and ask which named people hold them.

How long does an Adobe certification stay valid?

This page does not publish a figure, and the reason is worth knowing. A two-year validity period is widely repeated, including by one of the agencies ranked here, but it could not be confirmed in the text Adobe itself publishes: Adobe's renewal page as read on 23 September 2026 states that renewals are temporarily on hold and gives no validity period, so a two-year number would be a second-hand claim dressed as an Adobe one, which is exactly what this page criticises elsewhere. Adobe does run a renewal programme, and expiry is the reason a count matters less than it looks: a total published once and never updated can quietly include credentials that have lapsed. The question to put to an agency is not how long a certification lasts but how many of the certifications in its published total are active today, and how many belong to people who will be on your project.

Which of these agencies state their Adobe partner tier at a level?

Six of the nine, and the quality of the statement varies more than the level does. Krish TechnoLabs is the strongest, with 'Adobe Commerce specialized Gold solution partner' on its Adobe Commerce page and 'Award-winning Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner Agency' on its about page, naming level, specialization and current programme wording on two pages, uncontradicted. Codilar states 'trusted Adobe Commerce Gold Solution Partner', Classy Llama states 'Adobe Solution Partner Silver', and scandiweb states Gold but writes it three different ways across its own pages, including a non-standard plural. TMO Group states 'Adobe-certified Bronze Partner' only inside a blog post. Improntus records a Silver tier against 2022 to 2023 in a timeline rather than as a current fact. Three state no level at all: Publicis Sapient, Wagento and TechDivision.

Why does appearing in Adobe's partner directory earn no points here?

Because only one entry on this page was successfully looked up in it, and a criterion that rewards a check the rest of the field was not put through is not a ranking. Adobe lists scandiweb as a Gold Partner in its Solution Partner Directory, which is worth a buyer's two minutes and is linked in scandiweb's entry for that reason, but the directory renders as a JavaScript application whose search will not filter reliably, so absence from a lookup is an inconclusive lookup rather than an answer about the other eight. The tier criterion therefore applies one test to all nine, read from each agency's own website: is a level named, in current Adobe wording, on a page a buyer would open, and does anything else on the same site contradict it. On that test scandiweb does not come first.

Which of these agencies publish a Hyvä partner tier?

None of the eight publishes one, and this page does not score Hyvä at all. Codilar lists Hyvä themes among its Adobe Commerce capabilities, TechDivision lists Hyvä as a technology partner in its site navigation, and Wagento lists Hyvä under its partners and has delivered Hyvä work including a retheme and a Magento 2 build reporting a 95% performance score, but none of the three states a partner level. Hyvä publishes two directories and only the full agency register carries every tier, including Bronze, which the curated preferred-partner page does not show. No register lookup was run for these eight in this edition, so no Hyvä claim is made about any of them here. scandiweb is a Hyvä Platinum Partner, which is stated in its entry and, for the same reason, scored at nothing.

What should I ask an agency about its certifications on the first call?

Five questions, and this page exists because almost none of them are answered in public. How many certifications, not how many certified people, and which of the two your number is. How many of those are Adobe Commerce rather than Experience Manager, Analytics or another platform entirely. How they split across Professional, Expert and Architect Master. How many are currently active rather than earned at some point. And which named individuals hold them, of the people who would actually be assigned to your project. Every entry on this page records exactly which of these it leaves unanswered, so you can arrive with the gaps already listed. Ask for the answers in writing, and ask again at contract stage, because a certification total published on a website is a snapshot of a team that changes.

How can I check these scores myself?

Every entry prints its score and links the exact page its facts were read from, the reading date is printed in the methodology, and the six criteria and their full ladders are published in the table above, with the same weighting repeated as machine-readable structured data so the model can be re-run rather than taken on trust. The arithmetic is deliberately easy to attack. Only four points separate first from second, so raise Adobe Commerce specificity above 15 points and Krish TechnoLabs takes first place. Raise naming and level breakdown far enough and TechDivision, which publishes no count at all, climbs past four agencies that do. Drop readability below 30 and Wagento and Publicis Sapient both fall. For the two hidden numbers, check them yourself: view the page source of either site and search it for the figure, then look at the rendered page and see whether you can find it there.